Draft Laws



Advocates’ Proclamation No…2019 LATEST – 240419


WHEREAS it is of paramount importance to adequately regulate the advocates’ profession in the light of global and national changes;

WHEREAS, with due recognition that the Ethiopian legal infrastructure has lagged behind its rapid socio-economic transformation, the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia has embarked on a fundamental and wide-ranging effort of restructuring and reforming the existing laws and legal institutions;

WHEREAS, as in many areas of the law, the existing regulations of the advocate’s profession in Ethiopia are insufficient to address contemporary challenges that the new economic and social realities bring to bear;

WHEREAS, to align the reality in the legal practices market and the legal framework guiding it, a legislative guidance has become necessary;

WHEREAS, informed by the experiences of many different jurisdictions from different legal traditions, the need to lay a legal foundation that responds to many questions in the field is recognised;

WHEREAS public interest calls for a stable advocates’ profession with strong and independent regulatory institutions as part of the administration of justice to advance the rule of law and the uniform protection of human rights, including access to justice, throughout Ethiopia;

WHEREAS it is crucial for a society governed by the rule of law that the advocates’ profession has a self-regulatory power under a statutory framework;

NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Article 55 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, it is hereby proclaimed as follows.



Sub-section One – General

Article 1

Short Title

This Proclamation may be cited as the “Advocates’ Proclamation No…./2019”. 

Article 2


In this Proclamation, unless the context requires otherwise:

  • “Constitution” means the Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia;
  • “Advocate” means an individual to whom a license is issued in accordance with this Proclamation in order to engage in legal practice;
  • “Legal practice” means “any service that could be provided by an advocate including:
  1. advising a client on legal issues;
  2. drafting a legal document and/or executing a document on behalf of a client;
  3. representing a client before any governmental or non-governmental body, including courts, administrative tribunals, quasi-judicial bodies, arbitration tribunals and other alternative dispute resolution forum; and
  4. subject to a special license requirement, notarizing a document”;
  • “Federal Attorney General” means the government body established in accordance with the Federal Attorney General Establishment Proclamation No. 943/2016;
  • “Documents Authentication and Registration Agency” means the government body established in accordance with the Documents Authentication and Registration Proclamation No. 922/2016;
  • “Federal Bar” means the body established pursuant to Article 70 of this Proclamation.
  • “Region” means any regional state referred to in Article 47 (1) of the Constitution, excluding the Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa City Administrations.
  • Any expression in the masculine gender used in this Proclamation includes the feminine.

Article 3[1]

Scope of Application

This Proclamation shall govern advocates and law firms that engage in legal practice in the City Administrations of Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa or federal courts.



Article 4

Regulatory Objectives and Principles

  1. In the regulation of advocates, the regulator shall, in so far as it is practicable, strive to serve the following regulatory objectives:
    1. Protection and promotion of the rule of law;
    2. Protection and promotion of human rights, including access to justice;
    3. Protection and promotion of the interests of consumers;
    4. Ensuring fair competition in legal practice;
    5. Encouraging the development of an independent, strong, diverse and effective legal profession;
    6. Promoting and maintaining adherence to professional principles and rules; and
    7. Contributing to building one economic and political community.
  2. The regulatory objectives provided under Sub-article 1 of this Article shall be the objectives for the enactment of codes of conduct and bylaws, licensing of advocates and disciplinary proceedings.
  3. The regulator, in discharging its functions with a view to achieving the regulatory objective above, shall be guided by the following principles:
  4. Cost effectiveness;
  5. Proportionality of means to ends;
  6. Balanced and effective participation of stakeholders;
  7. Facilitative compliance first and enforcement as a last resort;
  8. Independence;
  9. Transparency; and
  10. Consistency and equality.



Sub-section One – Admission

Article 5


  1. No person shall engage in legal practice without being licensed by the Federal Bar.
  2. Any person who meets the qualification criteria as provided in this Section is entitled to be admitted to the advocates’ profession.
  3. The entry into and continued exercise of the advocates’ profession should not be denied in particular by reason of sex, religion, political or other opinion, ethnic or social origin, property, birth or physical disability.

Article 6

Qualification Criteria

Any person is qualified to work as an advocate if he:

  1. is a citizen of Ethiopia;
  2. holds a Bachelor of Laws degree from an accredited law school in Ethiopia;
  3. has successfully completed a two-year period of traineeship as provided in this Section;
  4. produces evidence that certifies he has passed the examinations for admission as may be prescribed by the Federal Bar;
  5. has good moral character;[2] and
  6. is not legally or judicial interdicted from engaging in legal practice.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 replies »

  1. Dear Abraham :first of all wants to grateful you for all your doings from the on set of this page.This page is from where we can get a lot of ideas as regard with the countries and foreign laws.In some instances I use to see some unusual users who are not informed of this page is a common page for a lot of persons and instead try to quarrel with their idea opponents.If we under stand the( why for this page is established) we have to avoid non academics and vulgar ideas and words that doesn’t add a value.

  2. I suggest that a provision that enables advocates to work in private organization as permanent employee like university lecturers, health professionals etc, depending on the agreement to be made b/n the employer and the advocate. B/se the existing proclamation which denies this right is discriminating when it is seen with other professionals who are legally permitted to work simultaneously as permanent employee and privately being licensed even in government institution. The law which denies the advocates this right is also against the advocates’ social security.

  3. As a lawyer , my views are goes to Article 6 &122 of the draft proc, respectively. .is there A lawyer also for English . will take you a custody ASSAP

  4. As a lawyer , my views are goes to Article 6 &122 of the draft proc, respectively. Article 6 of the draft proclamation it does not comprised the rest of of lawyers who are currently engaged in different government and non governmental organisation and it also stipulates the minimum 2 years experiance that enables to be an advocate in federal first instance court as per the content of previous proclamation. The draft proc, it does not mentioned the stages of advocates considering that the hierarchy of the federal court even though these are exhaustively take part in to account in the directive and regulation. The procl, it does not give as any clue about this junctures. The Second one is , Article 122 of these draft proclamation is not reasonable and persuasive. It provides in order to be an advocate having LLB degree is not required until 2027. which means that, it is tolerable to be an advocate with in diploma. I think that, Most of the drafters are intentionally elongated up to 2027 /for about 15 years in order to benefit the old lawyer who were slept on the society with out updating them selves with in contemporary modern legislations and practically to close the door on the young lawyers via playing on those patient society am highly objected these mysterious and funny act. And it is better if it is corrected before the approval of the proclamation. These are my few views but if I am deeply looked over it no doubt as to enormous problems are found on the draft. You have to leave the tournament of the game for the Young’s.

    • Don’t bother about others lawyers academic qualities. Only try your best to make your legal knowledge excellent. I darely speak to you that those old lawyers are much better than the today young lawyers.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.